Saturday, August 6, 2011
Blood & Gore is Coming Your Way !
We all know how the mainstream (more like LAMEstream) media loves to portray Al Gore the visionary "eco-prophet" who shared the undeserved 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his climate advocacy. But is Al Gore truly such a selfless do-gooder? What does it say about the motives of an environmental crusader when that person stands poised to rake in billions (yes, billions) of dollars from the very carbon credit trading scheme that he is tirelessly advocating?
That is exactly the position that Al Gore finds himself in. The leading advocate of the"theory of man-made global warming" is also one of the people who would likely benefit the most financially from the implementation of a "Cap & Trade" carbon credit trading scheme. You see, Al Gore is chairman of Generation Investment Management. David Blood, the former chief executive of the ratbag Goldman Sachs Asset Management, is the CEO.
Thus the apropos nickname - BLOOD and GORE - Wikipedia describes this Blood & Gore alliance this way: Generation Investment Management LLP (GIM) is a London-based investment management firm with an investment style that blends traditional equity research with a focus on sustainabilty factors, including social and environmental resposibilty and corprate governance.
It all sounds very noble, doesn't it? But the bottom line is that GIM is about making money...and lots of it. GIM owns a 10% stakes in the Chicago Climate Exchange which was started by Big Al and Maurice Strong as a "privately-owned" company in which the corrupt Chicage political machine (including Obama) invested. Obama was never the character he created for himself in the fairy-tale version in "Dreams of my Father". He's really the agent of Change and Hope for cohorts making money on the Global Warming fraud. Also to keep it in the "family", the Chicago Exchange owns half the European Climate Exchange.
Thus, when Europe adopted a cap & trade carbon credit scheme....Al Gore started earning millions. Gore insists that he is completely committed to solving the problems caused by "climate change" and that he is not ashamed of being ready to make tons of money off of those solutions. "I believe that the transition to a green economy is good for the world's economies and good for all of us and I have invested in it". Sure Al, we know your government subsidised Geothermal, Solar, Wind and Wave farms are great for your hip pocket alright.
The Way I See It....Al Gore isn't ready to back real environmental solutions which would not make him money. Just consider the following passage from a Newsweek article last year. "If we feed the biology and manage the grasslands appropriately, we could sequester as much carbon as we emit," says Timothy LaSalle, CEO of the Rodale Institute, who presented at two climate summits. The political clash is this: if you tell people soils can be managed to suck up lots of our carbon emissions, it sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card and could decrease what little enthusiasm there is for the warmists hysteria to reduce emissions.
One of Gore's crony assistants actually told LaSalle to "dial down your estimate"! He didn't. From other investigations I think LaSalle's idea could really work. But...since it would not make Blood & Gore any money it is not as good as the cap & trade carbon trading scheme which, I might add, would dramatically raise energy prices....as it already has to the poor citizens of the European Union and their economies.
As Blood & Gore starts to rake in billions of dollars world-wide and with Australia set to start such a program of carbon trading perhaps we will finally learn the true meaning of this Al Gore quote.....Reality does have a way of knocking on your door. Don't say I didn't warn you.
Friday, August 5, 2011
A Shocking & Inexcusable Vaccine Revelation !
Last month it was revealed that a former drug company scientist, Helen Taajczak, created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published a comprehensive review of autism research. However, even more impotant, her 79-page review contains one detail that could easily go unnoticed--five words that reveal one of the most shocking secrets Big Pharma has ever kept from us. "......grown in human fetal tissue."
The line reads (page 70): "An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue." Most people are unaware that human cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses have been used extensively in vaccine production for decades. And vaccine makers are happy that most of the public remained ignorant of this fact, as awareness of it could blow up in their faces.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissue---the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. his is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate your child.
Chicken pox vaccine, it's been revealed, is not the only vaccine manufactured in this way. According to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) the following vaccines are produced using cells from aborted fetuses and/or contain DNA proteins or related cellular debris! They are: Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella, Shingles, Hepatitis A and Rabies.
Dr Ratajczak explained that "human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people." I say it may more difficult, but it IS possible to prepare viral vaccines without the use of human or animal cells, as today's Hep B vaccine proves. The current version used since 1986 uses yeast cells. So why don't manufactures avoid using human cells altogether? I suspect there is little incentive for these people to develop and test new tissue cell methods when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology. TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
A recent study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to a question of whether there is a correlation between the abrupt rise in Autism with the introduction of fetal cells for use in vaccines since 1995. This correlation has prompted researchers to ask the question about how aborted fetal DNA could be causing or contributing to the development of Autism Disorders in children.
The Way I See It.....is if you care about what you put into your body, and into your child's body, and your are outraged by this information, you are not alone. How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these contaminated vaccines? The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork!
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to using fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins or related debris from cultures produced from aborted human fetuses.
The line reads (page 70): "An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue." Most people are unaware that human cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses have been used extensively in vaccine production for decades. And vaccine makers are happy that most of the public remained ignorant of this fact, as awareness of it could blow up in their faces.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissue---the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. his is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate your child.
Chicken pox vaccine, it's been revealed, is not the only vaccine manufactured in this way. According to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) the following vaccines are produced using cells from aborted fetuses and/or contain DNA proteins or related cellular debris! They are: Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella, Shingles, Hepatitis A and Rabies.
Dr Ratajczak explained that "human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people." I say it may more difficult, but it IS possible to prepare viral vaccines without the use of human or animal cells, as today's Hep B vaccine proves. The current version used since 1986 uses yeast cells. So why don't manufactures avoid using human cells altogether? I suspect there is little incentive for these people to develop and test new tissue cell methods when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology. TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
A recent study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to a question of whether there is a correlation between the abrupt rise in Autism with the introduction of fetal cells for use in vaccines since 1995. This correlation has prompted researchers to ask the question about how aborted fetal DNA could be causing or contributing to the development of Autism Disorders in children.
The Way I See It.....is if you care about what you put into your body, and into your child's body, and your are outraged by this information, you are not alone. How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these contaminated vaccines? The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork!
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to using fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins or related debris from cultures produced from aborted human fetuses.
Hello DIDO, Goodbye N.B.N !
A technology guru who has been described as the Thomas Edison of Silicon Valley claims to have developed a new wireless technology that could one day rival the download speeds on the National Broadband Network Australia's committed itself to build for $40 billion dollars over the next 5 years.
The new technology, called DIDO, allows Internet users to access download speeds up to 1000 times faster than possible on conventional wireless networks, without any fall in speed as more users get on to the network. Opposition government Communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull said this wireless breakthrough underlined the importance of being a "technology agnostic" when it came to choosing broadband solutions to meet the nation's needs.
The creator of the new DIDO technology, Steve Perlman, has built himself a successful reputation in his native United States where he has been credited with developing Apple's popular film-watching software QuickTime, as well as being involved in a number of successful technology start-ups. These include WebTV, one of the first services to link the Internet with televisions, sold to Microsoft in 1997 for $US500 million.
Mr Perlman claims his new wireless technology breaks Shannon's Law, a fundamental theorem of communications that posits all users on a wireless network must share bandwidth. This means that, on conventional wireless networks, download and upload speeds fall as more users are added to the network. But with DIDO that principle is turned on its head.
"We know we can get to 100-fold what is today's cellular systems provide and we are optimistic we can get to 1000-fold," Mr Perlman said in a recent talk at Columbia University, where he first publicly described the DIDO system.
The Way I See It....the potential of DIDO is to have unlimited numbers of simultaneous users, all streaming high-definition video, utilising the same spectrum that a single user would use with conventional wireless technology, with degradation in performance, no dead zones, no interference between users and no reduction in data rate as more users are added.
It looks like Gilliard's haste to please the Greens will see the N.B.N. immediately become a dinosaur and our billions would be down-the-toilet! Another Labor big spend linked with a missed opportunity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)