Last month it was revealed that a former drug company scientist, Helen Taajczak, created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published a comprehensive review of autism research. However, even more impotant, her 79-page review contains one detail that could easily go unnoticed--five words that reveal one of the most shocking secrets Big Pharma has ever kept from us. "......grown in human fetal tissue."
The line reads (page 70): "An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue." Most people are unaware that human cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses have been used extensively in vaccine production for decades. And vaccine makers are happy that most of the public remained ignorant of this fact, as awareness of it could blow up in their faces.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissue---the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. his is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate your child.
Chicken pox vaccine, it's been revealed, is not the only vaccine manufactured in this way. According to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) the following vaccines are produced using cells from aborted fetuses and/or contain DNA proteins or related cellular debris! They are: Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella, Shingles, Hepatitis A and Rabies.
Dr Ratajczak explained that "human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people." I say it may more difficult, but it IS possible to prepare viral vaccines without the use of human or animal cells, as today's Hep B vaccine proves. The current version used since 1986 uses yeast cells. So why don't manufactures avoid using human cells altogether? I suspect there is little incentive for these people to develop and test new tissue cell methods when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology. TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
A recent study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to a question of whether there is a correlation between the abrupt rise in Autism with the introduction of fetal cells for use in vaccines since 1995. This correlation has prompted researchers to ask the question about how aborted fetal DNA could be causing or contributing to the development of Autism Disorders in children.
The Way I See It.....is if you care about what you put into your body, and into your child's body, and your are outraged by this information, you are not alone. How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these contaminated vaccines? The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork!
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to using fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins or related debris from cultures produced from aborted human fetuses.
The line reads (page 70): "An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue." Most people are unaware that human cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses have been used extensively in vaccine production for decades. And vaccine makers are happy that most of the public remained ignorant of this fact, as awareness of it could blow up in their faces.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissue---the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. his is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate your child.
Chicken pox vaccine, it's been revealed, is not the only vaccine manufactured in this way. According to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) the following vaccines are produced using cells from aborted fetuses and/or contain DNA proteins or related cellular debris! They are: Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Varicella, Shingles, Hepatitis A and Rabies.
Dr Ratajczak explained that "human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people." I say it may more difficult, but it IS possible to prepare viral vaccines without the use of human or animal cells, as today's Hep B vaccine proves. The current version used since 1986 uses yeast cells. So why don't manufactures avoid using human cells altogether? I suspect there is little incentive for these people to develop and test new tissue cell methods when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology. TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
A recent study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to a question of whether there is a correlation between the abrupt rise in Autism with the introduction of fetal cells for use in vaccines since 1995. This correlation has prompted researchers to ask the question about how aborted fetal DNA could be causing or contributing to the development of Autism Disorders in children.
The Way I See It.....is if you care about what you put into your body, and into your child's body, and your are outraged by this information, you are not alone. How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these contaminated vaccines? The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork!
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to using fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins or related debris from cultures produced from aborted human fetuses.
No comments:
Post a Comment